|
By examining data for animals
such as crayfish and salamanders,
researchers have identified new ways of comparing mercury levels
both within and across watersheds. In addition, by carefully analyzing
new data scientists have discovered high mercury levels in unexpected
places. Not only does mercury pose a threat to fish and the people
eating them, but animals living in habitats as diverse as mountain-tops
and small headwater streams should now be considered at risk for
mercury poisoning.
Crayfish as mercury yardsticks
(Paper 12)
Crayfish are relatively long-lived
invertebrates (organisms without backbones) that reside in many
different habitats within a watershed. They live in small headwater
streams, large lakes and all water types in bet ween. Crayfish
also have small home ranges and remain wit hin the same area for
most of their life. As such, they reflect mercury in their immediate
surroundings and provide a useful yardstick for comparing mercury
levels throughout a specific watershed (Figure 8). These same
characteristics make crayfish useful locators of high mercuy levels
that may originate from local point sources such as an old landfill.
Researchers collected and analyzed
crayfish over a period of four years from sites in Vermont, New
Hampshire and Maine. Mercury concentrations ranged from 0.04 to
0.50 ppm. Half of the crayfish examined had mercury levels above
the expected background level of 0.10 ppm. Larger crayfish and
crayfish living in rivers and streams showed higher mercury levels
than other individuals. As is the case for fish and wildlife,
nearly all of the tail mercury existed in t he toxic methyl form
(88 percent). Animals that regularly eat crayfish include bass,
loons and raccoons.
Salamanders detect mercury
in headwaters (Paper 14)
Scientists analyzed
mercury in northern two-lined salamanders that inhabit streams
throughout eastern North America. Their study sites included Acadia
National Park (ANP) and Bear Brook Watershed (BBW) in Maine, as
well as Shenandoah National Park (SNP) in Virginia. Streams in
each of these study sites represent differences in mercury deposition
and land use history. This is the first study to analyze the effects
of chronic acidification, fire history and forest cover on mercury
levels in a stream-dwelling amphibian species.
The mercury in two-lined salamanders was elevated
and ranged from 0.02 to 0.08 ppm. The mercury concentrations in
these salamanders were higher than those found in brook trout,
and most of it occurred as methylmercury.
Data from the acidic stream in BBW indicate
that mercury bioaccumulation was higher in this acidic environment.
This is presumably due to the greater presence of sulfate reducing
bacteria and transfer of mercury through the food web in this
acidic environment.
The highest mercury levels in two-lined salamanders
were found in the conifer-dominated watershed in ANP where there
was no history of fire. This result suggests that fire history
and forest cover may also affect mercur y bioaccumulation, as
has been suggested by previous research. This study illustrates
the important role t hat acidification, land use and forest cover
play in mercury cycling and underscores t he importance of assessing
sensitive watersheds.
Scientists document widespread
mercury in aquatic birds (Papers 15, 17 and 18)
The use of aquatic birds
as indicators of mercury contamination has been a common practice
for years. Recently, scientists have discovered the importance
of using several bird species to compare pollution levels across
different ecosystem types (e.g. lakes versus wetlands). A dataset
of more than 4,700 records representing 38 different bird species
was compiled to assess differences among bird species, geographic
areas, habitat types, size, age and gender.
Elevated
mercury levels were detected in most aquatic and even some terrestrial
habitats (Figure 11). Selected indicator species that represent
fish and insect food chains are useful for monitoring changing
mercury levels and identif ying sensitive areas across the Northeast.
In particular, the common loon serves this role well because of
its position on the food chain, prey choice, habitat, and abundance
(Box 2).
To understand how mercur y levels
compare in different bird species living in the same environment,
researchers evaluated mercur y data for five species on Aziscohos
and Flagstaff lakes in Maine. The results show t hat large fish-eating
birds had the highest mercury levels and plant-eating birds had
the lowest. In general, mercur y levels ranged from low to high
as follows: wood duck < tree swallow < belted kingfisher
< common merganser < common loon. This information is useful
when choosing indicators species and confirms the common loon
serves that role well.
Insect-eating birds in aquatic
environments generally had lower mercury than their fish-eating
neighbors, but some did not follow this pattern. Specifically,
a northern waterthrush from a river in Massachusetts had mercury
levels of 1.6 ppm in its blood. This level was higher than the
mercury found in all of the more than 100 juvenile bald eagles
that were sampled. Scientists attribute these high mercury levels
in a non-fish-eating bird because it is at the top of a food chain
that has multiple links. The more linkages there are in a food
chain, the greater the rate of biomagnification.
In
another review of this extensive dataset, scientists analyzed
samples from bald eagles and belted kingfishers and determined
that mercury tends to increase across habitat types from marine
areas, to estuaries and rivers, and is highest in lakes (Figure
9). Therefore, a bald eagle nesting near a lake would likely have
higher mercury levels than one near the coast. This information
can be used to help focus mercury reduction efforts on ecosystems
with high mercury in wildlife.
Research
reveals mercury in forest songbirds (Paper 16)
One of the most significant
discoveries made in this comprehensive data analysis is the
presence of mercury in non-aquatic songbirds. Scientists collected
blood and feather samples from four species of mountain-dwelling
songbirds at sites on Mt. Mansfield in Vermont: Bicknell’s
thrush, blackpoll warbler, white-throated sparrow and yellow-rumped
warbler. In addition, they sampled Bicknell’s thrush at
20 other sites from Vermont to Gaspe Peninsula in Quebec. The
data on Bicknell’s thrush provide the most comprehensive
information to date on mercury in a strictly terrestrial, insect-eating
songbird.
The
results from this new study show that songbirds in mountain forests
are accumulating mercury. Among the four species sampled on Mt.
Mansfield, mercury concentrations in blood were highest in the
Bicknell’s thrush (0.08 to 0.38 ppm). Feather mercury levels
were greatest in Bicknell’s thrush older than two years,
suggesting that the mercury in these birds is building up over
time. Nearly all of the mercury measured in these birds was in
the methyl form, indicating that mercury is accumulating in food
webs within high elevation forest environments.
The spatial pattern of mercury in the blood of Bicknell’s
thrush shows that levels are highest in areas that are expected
to receive high inputs of mercury in litterfall (Figure 10). The
higher mercury blood concentrations of Bicknell’s thrushes
in the southern versus northern Green Mountains of Vermont parallels
deposition estimates for these sites. Overall, Bicknell’s
thrush blood mercur y levels were highest in the western Maine
mountains and lowest in the Gaspe Peninsula, Quebec. Known mercury
sources, mercury deposition models, and new songbird and fish
mercury data all suggest that the Catskill Mountains and nearby
areas of the Appalachian Mountains are potentially
at greater ecological risk for mercury accumulation.

Mercury
found in mink and river otter (Paper 19)
Mink and river otter are mammals
that feed on fish and crayfish and have the potential
to accumulate toxic levels of mercury in their bodies. Scientists
compiled mercury data for mink and otter across New York, New
England and Nova Scotia. The average mercury concentrations in
mink liver ranged from 1.01 to 3.01 ppm with the highest levels
occurring in Massachusetts and Connecticut. Average mercury levels
in river otter liver ranged from 0.85 to 2.10 ppm, with no clear
regional pattern.
When evaluating ecological impacts, it is important
to compare mercury concentrations to levels that are associated
with adverse effects. For mink and otter, that level
has been established at 20 ppm of mercury in fur. It can also
be helpful to look beyond the average mercury level to the maximum
level, since these high levels could have acute effects. Thresholds
for acute mercury toxicity leading to the death of mink and otter
have been defined from laboratory studies and field observations
as approximately 47 ppm in fur. Figure 12 compares these thresholds
to mercury levels found in mink and otter fur in the Northeast.
A
long-term dataset from New York state allowed scientists to evaluate
changes in mercury levels over time. They found a statistically
significant decrease in both otter and mink mercur y levels between
the periods 1982-1984 and 1998-2000. Mercury in the liver of otters
decreased approximately 26 percent between these two periods and
mink liver mercury declined roughly 37 percent. The declines were
remarkably similar between adult and young otter as well as bet
ween male and female mink. The uniform decline suggests decreases
in mercury will produce improvements in mink and otter regardless
of species, age and gender.
|